Mike Huckabee and other liars
So those wankers are at it again. No apologies for my language.
First they went after Max Cleland (D - GA), a veritable hero from Vietnam.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Cleland
Next in line was John Kerry (D- MA), another Vietnam hero.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swift_Vets_and_POWs_for_Truth
Now they are after John McCain (R- AZ) a true Vietnam war hero.
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/world/story.html?id=245310
Do these folks have no shame?
Decent Republicans and Democrats must disavow this crap. It is un-American, indecent, cruel, and untruthful.
-----------------------
Meanwhile, be aware that Mike Huckabee (likable as he is supposed to be), is a dangerous candidate.
He believes that all illegal immigrants should be deported. Quite apart from the fact that the American economy depends on immigrants - how in heaven’s name will we deport 11-13 million people.
He believes that Palestinians should be moved from their ancestral homelands, and be “given” a State in Egypt or Jordan.
He proposes a sales tax for all Americans and the abolition of Income Tax.
Does he not understand that a graduated Income Tax brings biblical justice to rich and poor, and that a sales tax is oppressive for God’s beloved poor.
He sees a slippery slope between loving gay partnerships and bestiality.
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gay-9dVnR5uc8ClmdJAUAEcfrVlA
What a lie. What a disgrace. How can this “born again” Baptist Minister be such a hateful liar?
No decent Republican should vote for him
----------------------------------------
So read this wonderfully humorous “blog” from the Right Wing London “Daily Telegraph”
The Telegraph's Damian Lanigan blogs an hilarious riposte to Mike Huckabee's concerns about same-sex Santoruming:
"Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee yesterday equated gay marriage with inter-species marriage:Southern Baptist minister Mike Huckabee campaigns in South Carolina
QUESTIONER: "Is it your goal to bring the Constitution into strict conformity with the Bible? Some people would consider that a kind of dangerous undertaking, particularly given the variety of biblical interpretations."
HUCKABEE: "Well, I don't think that's a radical view to say we're going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again. I think the radical position is to make a change in what's been historic."
We need to ask the ex-Governor a straight question: don't you think, at the very least, that the issue of consent is a major difference between adult homosexual relations and sex with animals? Does he know how difficult it is, for instance, to get a rabbit to go for a drink with you, let alone to persuade it to come back to your place for coffee and a parsnip? Has he *tried* hooking up in a petting zoo? The very least you're going to need a lasso and gritty determination. Some people have even had to resort to Rohypnol.
Llamas don't go down easy, you know. I've heard that human / avian wedding arrangements are particularly difficult: it doesn't matter how many times you ask a budgie whether they'd like a civil or religious ceremony, they just repeat the question and keep pecking away at the old millet sock.
I'm sure I could think of other differences between human gay relationships and human / animal ones, but I have to go: my wife is stuck again up a neighbour’s tree.
First they went after Max Cleland (D - GA), a veritable hero from Vietnam.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Cleland
Next in line was John Kerry (D- MA), another Vietnam hero.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swift_Vets_and_POWs_for_Truth
Now they are after John McCain (R- AZ) a true Vietnam war hero.
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/world/story.html?id=245310
Do these folks have no shame?
Decent Republicans and Democrats must disavow this crap. It is un-American, indecent, cruel, and untruthful.
-----------------------
Meanwhile, be aware that Mike Huckabee (likable as he is supposed to be), is a dangerous candidate.
He believes that all illegal immigrants should be deported. Quite apart from the fact that the American economy depends on immigrants - how in heaven’s name will we deport 11-13 million people.
He believes that Palestinians should be moved from their ancestral homelands, and be “given” a State in Egypt or Jordan.
He proposes a sales tax for all Americans and the abolition of Income Tax.
Does he not understand that a graduated Income Tax brings biblical justice to rich and poor, and that a sales tax is oppressive for God’s beloved poor.
He sees a slippery slope between loving gay partnerships and bestiality.
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gay-9dVnR5uc8ClmdJAUAEcfrVlA
What a lie. What a disgrace. How can this “born again” Baptist Minister be such a hateful liar?
No decent Republican should vote for him
----------------------------------------
So read this wonderfully humorous “blog” from the Right Wing London “Daily Telegraph”
The Telegraph's Damian Lanigan blogs an hilarious riposte to Mike Huckabee's concerns about same-sex Santoruming:
"Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee yesterday equated gay marriage with inter-species marriage:Southern Baptist minister Mike Huckabee campaigns in South Carolina
QUESTIONER: "Is it your goal to bring the Constitution into strict conformity with the Bible? Some people would consider that a kind of dangerous undertaking, particularly given the variety of biblical interpretations."
HUCKABEE: "Well, I don't think that's a radical view to say we're going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again. I think the radical position is to make a change in what's been historic."
We need to ask the ex-Governor a straight question: don't you think, at the very least, that the issue of consent is a major difference between adult homosexual relations and sex with animals? Does he know how difficult it is, for instance, to get a rabbit to go for a drink with you, let alone to persuade it to come back to your place for coffee and a parsnip? Has he *tried* hooking up in a petting zoo? The very least you're going to need a lasso and gritty determination. Some people have even had to resort to Rohypnol.
Llamas don't go down easy, you know. I've heard that human / avian wedding arrangements are particularly difficult: it doesn't matter how many times you ask a budgie whether they'd like a civil or religious ceremony, they just repeat the question and keep pecking away at the old millet sock.
I'm sure I could think of other differences between human gay relationships and human / animal ones, but I have to go: my wife is stuck again up a neighbour’s tree.
Comments
Post a Comment