"Comment is free but facts are sacred" (C.P.Scott 1846-1932) (2)
A
Facebook friend of mine posted this photo’ the other day.
My friend added: “Dam
straight we the American people where here first and our founding fathers came
up with this. It's not here to offend it's here to let everyone know where we
are. A free Country. In china don't they make you respite things only about
them? In Russia don't they do the same thing with a little old fashion brain
washing!” (sic)
I
gently corrected him as to the origin of the pledge, (it was not written by the Founding Fathers) to which he responded:
“I under stand that all. But us
feeling like we have to watch every word we say in side our own country? This
is getting unreal.” (sic)
I replied:
“What words do you have in mind? (I don't find the need to watch
any of my words (except those which could be cruel or unkind).” (I also should have said
“untrue”).
I went
on to say: “And of course the Pledge of
Allegiance IS said in most schools.
It's an urban myth that it can no longer be used, although
no child may be forced to say it.”
I am
very fond of this particular Facebook friend.
I think that I understand his sentiments. And yet…. “comment is free, but facts are sacred”. I
had to remind of a fact …. the Pledge of
Allegiance IS said in most schools.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is
a potted history of the pledge - I
“lifted this from the web”
The Pledge of Allegiance was written
in August 1892 by the (1) socialist minister Francis Bellamy
(1855-1931). It was originally published in The Youth's Companion on September
8, 1892. Bellamy had hoped that the pledge would be used by citizens in any
country.
In its original form it read:
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
In 1923, the words, "the Flag of the United States of America" were added. At this time it read:
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
In 1954, in response to the Communist threat of the times, (2) President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words "under God," creating the 31-word pledge we know say today.
In its original form it read:
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
In 1923, the words, "the Flag of the United States of America" were added. At this time it read:
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
In 1954, in response to the Communist threat of the times, (2) President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words "under God," creating the 31-word pledge we know say today.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also
lifted the following from the web with, in the interests of clarity, some
slight but not material changes.
The
Supreme Court ruled about the voluntary nature of saying the Pledge way back
in1943.
"In
the case West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette”, the
Supreme Court found that the right to remain silent during the Pledge of
Allegiance stems from the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Just as the First Amendment protects our right to express our beliefs, it
prohibits the government from compelling us to declare a belief that we do not
hold.
As the
Barnette court wrote, “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional
constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall
be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or
force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.” (3)
(1) “Shock, horror, disbelief” The original pledge was written by a
Socialist.
(2) What a shame that Ike intervened and that Congress got in on the
act. What should have been a personal pledge made or not made in private
conscience became a quasi-governmental utterance. That was an example of the kind of big and interfering Government which
I deplore (and it was suggested by a Republican President to a Republican
Congress.)
(3) Can any of us
imagine that the present conservative majority and ideologically right wing “Roberts”
Supreme Court which, (against all
Republican Party principles has been so entirely “judicially activist” in creating
new laws), would be capable of
issuing such a constitutionally centered ruling as did the “Barnette” Supreme
Court in 1943.
Comments
Post a Comment